Sumsub vs IDnow
Verified facts in one table - licence, EEA data residency, rails, cards and published pricing. Shared ground: KYC/KYB. No verdict - which one fits depends on your build, and that is what the match request is for.
The facts, side by side
Every row comes from the source-verified catalogue - blank means not documented at source, not absent. Full context on each profile.
| Sumsub | IDnow | |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | UK (UK / EU) | EU core (Germany) |
| EEA data residency | Partial | Yes |
| Licence type | Vendor | Vendor |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Verified | Verified 2026-06-25 | Verified 2026-06-25 |
| Product categories | KYC/KYB | KYC/KYB, Digital identity & eIDAS |
| Published entry price | from USD 1.35/verification | not published (sales-led) |
How to read the sovereignty rows: EEA data residency explains Yes / Partial / No, the sovereignty framework covers origin and ownership, and the card-scheme map explains why the scheme row looks the way it does. Pricing context: what is published vs negotiated.
FAQ
What licences do Sumsub and IDnow hold?
Sumsub operates as an unlicensed software vendor headquartered in UK / EU - regulatory obligations sit with the client; IDnow as an unlicensed software vendor headquartered in Germany - regulatory obligations sit with the client. Both are verified at source, and their official register entries are linked from their profiles.
Do Sumsub and IDnow keep data in the EEA?
Sumsub is EEA: Partial - a non-EEA leg is named on its profile. IDnow runs fully on EEA data rails (EEA: Yes). What Yes / Partial / No mean - and why an EEA data centre alone is not the whole answer - is explained in the EEA data residency guide.